Libya: Why Are We There?

    I haven't discussed the military operation (war) in Libya up until now because I was waiting to see whether we would go into Libya or not, then we went into Libya alongside NATO and I wanted to give our President a chance to give an explanation as to why we are in Libya as well as see how the operation was being handled.  

    First, I don't think the situation in Libya qualifies as a legitimate humanitarian mission involving our military.  If Iraq didn't qualify according to Obama, liberals, and the UN then how the heck could Libya possibly qualify as a legitimate humanitarian mission?  To me it seems like the United States has little or no political interest in Libya.  We only get 5 percent of our oil from Libya whereas Europe is much more dependent on Libya for oil.  If France and the U.K. wanted to go into Libya to protect their oil supply and other national interests then that is their business but the U.S. should have let them go on this military operation without us.

    President Obama was the absent, silent Commander-in-Chief for the first couple weeks of the uprising against Muammar Gaddafi. Then, Obama announced that he wanted regime change. Heck, I'd like another regime change LOL! In addition, President Obama and his foreign policy team were hardly ever, if ever, on the same page with regards on how they to handle Gaddafi.  And now Obama only wants to aid the rebels, even though we don't know who they are, without forcing Gaddafi to step down.  There is information to suggest that there are pockets of Al-Qaeda amongst the rebels.  Why the heck are we aiding terrorists who want to kill us?  So now the U.S. is a part of a no-fly zone, just like Iraq was under a no-fly zone for 12 years.  Does NATO and the U.S. plan to have Gaddafi under a no-fly zone for anywhere near the length of time that Iraq was under a no-fly zone?  I hope not.

    Obama said our interests and values are at stake. How? American values are at stake because Libyans are engaging in a civil war?  That is nonsensical. He says we have a responsibility to act. If we didn't have a responsibility to act in Iraq then surely we don't don't have even 1/10th the responsibility to act in Libya.  Saddam Hussein came into power in 1979.  Under Saddam Hussein there was government-approved mass murder, torture, forced disappearances, and rapes being committed.  There were also chemical weapons. In 1988 Saddam led a brutal campaign which ended up slaughtering 50,000 to 100,000 Shiite Kurds. In 1991 Saddam committed widespread massacres which is estimated to have killed between 80,000 and 230,000 Iraqis.  Those are only a few of the horrors committed by Saddam Hussein.  Plus, Saddam violated 18 UN sanctions.  The UN had found that he had blocked the arms inspectors from being able to do their jobs but he denied it.  Saddam claimed that Iraq didn't have any banned chemical, biological and nuclear weapons programmes. You can view a list of human rights violations here.  It was already known at the time that Saddam had previously used a wide array of chemical weapons against the Kurds including Sarin, mustard gas, and nerve agents that killed thousands but yet he denied possessing chemical weapons.  Since he had already used chemical weapons on his own people, had obstructed the weapons inspectors from being able to find out whether he did in fact have chemical, biological, and nuclear weapons or not there was no way we could trust a dictator's word.   Since Saddam's denials of possessing weapons had been proven to be false many times before his denials of having WMD's in his possession lacked plausibility.  If you look at all the brutality that Saddam ordered and did how the heck could liberals with a straight face possibly claim that the military action in Iraq was not justifiable, especially when most liberals voted to authorize the use of force?

    And, what did Obama say about removing dictators in 2005?  Shall we say hypocrisy?

    Many liberals believe this military action in Libya to be the right thing to do because we went into Libya with the United Nations.  For anyone to give credence to the U.N. is absurd, especially after the oil for food scandal.  Obama said "Then we took a series of swift steps in a matter of days to answer Gadhafi's aggression."  For about three weeks Obama was dilly-dallying as the rebels were winning and kicking butt against Gaddafi, taking control of cities but there was nothing but was inaction and mixed messages on the part of this administration.  Now, I am not for this military action but I am just pointing out that I would hardly call this swift action.

    In 1977 Gaddafi tried to buy a bomb, then a nuclear weapon, and weapons of mass destruction.  In 2005 weapons inspectors found chemical weapons in Libya. Several people were indicted for assisting Gaddafi but why wasn't Gaddafi indicted also? He is suspected of being behind the Lockerbie bombing but was never brought up on charges.  Why is that? Gaddafi had numerous clashes with other countries and there may have been a time when he killed some of his military when he first began his rule, and now he has killed some civilians but why are we using military force in Libya?  I have no doubt that he's a bad, bad dude but I don't see how it is in the United States' best interest to be in Libya.  So I ask why are we in Libya?Source URL:
    Visit Out law republican for Daily Updated Hairstyles Collection

Iran is Preparing the Way for the 12th Imam; Expecting Him Very Soon

    From TCL: Looks like the Iranian government thinks the 12th imam is going to climb out of the well very soon.

    H/T The Conservative Lady 

    From TCL:

    Go to A Time To Betray, where you can view the entire 28 minute video.  As reported at A Time To Betray:

    Currently this movie is being distributed throughout the Basij and Revolutionary Guards’ bases. The producers are in the middle of translating it into Arabic with the purpose of mass distribution throughout the Middle East. Their intention is to incite further uprisings with the hopes of motivating Arabs to overthrow U.S. backed governments with the final goal of the annihilation of Israel and Allah’s governance of the world!
    Source URL:
    Visit Out law republican for Daily Updated Hairstyles Collection

I Will Not Now Nor Shall I Ever Put Up With Anti-Catholic Bigotry

    There is a difference between useful criticism of a particular religion and just spouting words of hate against one's religion.  This includes when a person just simply spouts off words without backing them up with facts. When someone consistently targets another's religion and solely focuses on attacking it consistently time after time one should not be surprised that a person who believes in that religion might get upset and defensive.  I am sick of certain conservative bloggers who have consistently engaged in Catholic bashing without giving useful or healthy criticism.  Apparently, I have lost a few conservative friends over the discussion defending the biblical truth that the Sabbath is on Sunday under the New Covenant.  It is also distressing that those who claim to be open-minded about biblical controversies weren't really open to being persuaded to the counter position even when shown biblical text and historical evidence.  I will always defend my Faith.  Following Christ and His Church are the most important things in my life and if people can't handle or understand that then I really feel sorry for them.  If they decide to unfriend me or stop following my blog oh well because in the end I know in my heart and soul that I am staying true to my beliefs.  When someone respects my religious beliefs I respects theirs.  It is as simple as that.Source URL:
    Visit Out law republican for Daily Updated Hairstyles Collection

Miley Cyrus is not single

    The singer-and-actress – who was recently romantically linked to British actor Joshua Bowman after meeting him on the set of new movie ‘So Undercover’ – “loves” Australian boys, including her ex-boyfriend Liam Hemsworth, but does not plan to fall for one on a forthcoming trip Down Under as she is in a relationship.

    Miley said: “I don’t want to cross out the Australian boys but I may or may not be single ... I love Australian boys though obviously.

    “Liam and I are very close, I’m not going to comment too much, but you guys don’t have to worry about that ... I’m definitely not coming to Australia single.”

    Miley, 18, also revealed she is not a fan of social networking site twitter because she doesn’t want to be “hypocritical” by encouraging interest in her personal life.

    She told 2Day FM’s Kyle & Jackie O Show: “I do not tweet, I do not social network, I try to stay out of it ... for me, I complain enough about people knowing too much about my private life, so to go out there and exploit myself would be silly and hypocritical of what I stand for.”

    The ‘Last Song’ actress was said to be “inseparable” from Joshua at the wrap party for ‘So Undercover’ earlier this year, but were taking things slowly.

    A source said: “They were inseparable at the movie's wrap party but Miley's back in Los Angeles at the moment and Joshua's in Louisiana, so they're going to see how it goes."Source URL:
    Visit Out law republican for Daily Updated Hairstyles Collection

funny April fool's pranks

    Toilet Trouble

    Put a piece of bubblewrap under the toilet seat so when your victim sits, they are surprised by a loud POP!

    You Spilled What

    Find an old bottle of nail polish that you don't want anymore. Unscrew the cap and set it sideways on a piece of waxed paper, letting the contents flow out into a puddle. When it dries completely, peel it off of the paper. Now you can put it anywhere and trick someone into thinking there is spilled nail polish. Works best on something your victim cherishes or on one of their important documents!

    Classic Pranks

    Two Black Eyes

    Put a dark substance around the eyepiece of a pair of binoculars (we recommend dark eye-shadow instead of the black shoe polish used in the classic prank of yesteryear). Hand them to your victim and point out something for them to look at in the distance. Then laugh at the dark circles around their eyes.

    Trip and Slip

    Wait until your victim is in the kitchen. Come in and start filling a bucket with water (tell them you're washing the car or something). Only instead of actually filling the bucket, just pretend. Lift the bucket with both hands, acting like it's heavy and filled with water. Take a couple of steps in the victim's direction and suddenly "trip" and aim the bucket right toward them. They'll duck thinking they're getting splashed!

    Do the Splits

    Find a scrap of cloth. Place a dollar on the floor and stay nearby. When the victim comes by and bends down to pick up the dollar, rip the cloth loudly. Most people will reach back to see if they ripped their pants. One of the original classic April Fool's pranks of all time! 


    Crossed Wires
    Either late on March 31st or very early on April 1st sneak into a shared office and unplug two phones and re-plug them in with the lines crossed. Both victims will go nuts trying to figure out why they're getting each others' calls.

    The Walls Have Eyes

    Buy a bunch of googly eyes from a craft store and stick them everywhere all over a person's desk.

    Stop the Calls

    If the victim has a phone with a hook that presses down when the handset is in the cradle, tape it down. When he or she answers a call it will keep ringing.

    computer pranks
    Document Panic
    Has your victim been working on an important document on their computer? Carefully hide the document in a safe place, then create a fake document with the same name. Fill the document with gobbledy-gook or a funny story. At the bottom put "April Fool's!"

    Embarrassing Find

    Sneak onto your victim's computer and do a Google search for something really embarrassing (hemorrhoids, gender reassignment surgery, butt pimples, etc.). Leave the results window open for all to see!
    Source URL:
    Visit Out law republican for Daily Updated Hairstyles Collection

America The Beautiful

Voyagers!: I Wish We Had TV Shows Like This Today

    As of late, I have been thinking about old television shows. Do you remember when most T.V. shows that were on television were wholesome, promoted ethical values, didn't have an anti-American slant, and didn't promote a political agenda? My husband and I began to make a list of old TV shows which we enjoyed watching while growing up. Do you remember any of these: Voyagers!, The Electric Company, Picture Pages, Captain Kangaroo, Chips, Emergency!, Little House on the Prairie, The Waltons, Walker Texas Ranger, The Brady Bunch, The Incredible Hulk, Lassie, Fat Albert, Great Space Coaster, Barney Miller, Good Times, and What's Happening!! ? Wouldn't it be nice if we had T.V. shows like this today that didn't propagandize kids?  Some of these were reruns when I was growing up.  Having shows that teach good morals is especially important for children today. What were some of your favorite T.V. shows growing up?

    Here are a few shows from the past:

    Great Space Coaster:

    Picture Pages with Bill Cosby:

    Here is full episode of the show Voyagers!:

    There is a little bit of overlap with the videos so you can skip to about the 4 minute mark to continue watching the show.

    Source URL:
    Visit Out law republican for Daily Updated Hairstyles Collection

School Choice and Better Opportunities: Woman Confronts Bill Ayers With Facts

Kate Middleton Comparison with Princess Lady Diana

     What bride-to-be wants to compete with her mother-in-law?

    In the case of  Kate Middleton, comparisons with the Princess Diana are inevitable and sometimes completely uncanny.The former Lady Diana Spencer was perceived as a bit frumpy when the 19-year-old kindergarten teacher became engaged to heir to the throne Prince Charles in 1981. Once in the royal spotlight, she emerged as the style icon of her time.

    Middleton, who just turned 29, has had more time to hone her independence and casually elegant personal style, which includes her habit of shopping her own closet (rather than designer showrooms) for special occasions.

    Yet remarkably, the two women seem to have more in common than their mutual affection for Prince William and a poignantly shared diamond-and-sapphire engagement ring.
     Meanwhile, read about the shade of blue-gray nail polish that’s been given a witty name in Middleton’s honor.

    And take a peek at the sheer dress Middleton wore when she met Prince William that’s now considered a valuable royal collectible.

    Is This The New People’s Princess? How Confident Kate Middleton Compares To “Shy Di”
     Kate is already of tougher sorts. Former newspaper editor Piers Morgan wrote: ‘I’ve rarely seen anyone enjoy the attentions of a camera lens quite like Prince William’s squeeze.’

    Indeed, Kate does possess a confidence when on show. She was seemingly unfazed as she entered the Sandhurst parade ground for William’s graduation flanked by his private secretary as everyone but the Queen and the Prince of Wales was already seated.

    But her intention to keep the media at bay is clear. Before her engagement Diana invited a newspaper journalist into her flat for a chat and a cup of tea.

    Kate is well aware it would be a risky move. She has kept quiet so far and, knowing William’s distrust of the press, will continue to do so unless at official events or photocalls.

    She already has her own lawyer – who also represents the Prince of Wales – and he swiftly set about writing to newspaper editors to protest at her harassment and pursued media outlets if he believed her privacy had been breached.

    Diana became skilled at using the media for her own agenda, from her interview on Panorama, to the moment she turned up in a striking black cocktail dress on the night Charles admitted infidelity on television.

    The cameras were still clicking years later as she lay dying inside a mangled Mercedes in an underpass in Paris.

    As Kate prepares to enter the Royal Family, the public will be asking whether she is able to take up Diana’s mantle as their favourite Princess.

    Keeping her mouth shut and with a lawyer in tow, Kate is already acting on the hindsight that Diana’s legacy left behind.

    Is Kate Middleton Trying Too Hard To Be Princess Diana

     First comes love, then comes marriage…then comes, the transformation into the next Princess Diana? While Kate Middleton and Prince William should be enjoying the post-engagement bliss, with glowing faces and lazy wedding making plans, the Royal family seems to have a different idea. Prince William and Kate Middleton Pose For Engagement Photos

    While it may be common practice for a man to pass on a “family ring,” that doesn’t generally mean that the woman follows every step of the groom’s mother from there on out, perhaps it’s different for a Princess-to-be. Recently British paparazzi spotted Middleton with her mother and sister stepping into the famous designer, Bruce Oldfield’s shop. Sure, standard practice for a bride-to-be to look for her wedding dress, but Kate isn’t any bride and walking in Princess Diana’s footsteps isn’t an easy feat.
    While Princess Diana happened to favor Oldfield, it seems like Kate is doing her best to please the Royal family and make her debut, as part of their monarchy and be warmly welcomed by the British people.

    “It must have been a special appointment because as a general rule Mr. Oldfield does not do front-of-shop work,” a source recently told NY Daily News, special may be an understatement?

    Regardless of which designer Kate chooses, we know she’ll look stunning- the real concern here; is the pressure to join the Royal family and match up to their standards too much weight for this uber-in-love couple to handle long term? We shall see…..we’re rooting for you Kate and Prince William. Also, fashion note: you’d look flawless in lace, Kate–perhaps tell Oldfield we said so.

    ‘Don’t turn Kate into another Diana

     One of the UK’s most avid royal-watchers based in Norfolk has urged journalists not to turn Kate Middleton into “another Princess Diana”.

    Pensioner Mary Relph, who lives near the royal estate in Sandringham, Norfolk, also called on The Queen to break with tradition and invite Miss Middleton to spend Christmas with the Royal Family.

    Mrs Relph, 76, of Shouldham, Norfolk, regularly presents members of the Royal Family with flowers when they make public appearances in East Anglia.

    “It’s wonderful news,” she said. “But I hope they don’t turn her into another Diana. The press really hounded Diana and I wouldn’t like to see that happen again
    But Mrs Relph said she hoped Miss Middleton would join the Royal Family in Sandringham at Christmas and attend church on the estate on Christmas Day.

    “Normally only family members attend the Christmas Day service at Sandringham,” she added.

    “But it would be lovely if they broke with tradition and invited Kate Middleton. People would be thrilled to see her attending the Christmas Day church service with William.”

    Source URL:
    Visit Out law republican for Daily Updated Hairstyles Collection

Saturday or Sunday Sabbath? A Response To Christopher of Conservative Perspective

    Christopher, at Conservative Perspective has a post where he shows why he thinks that Saturday should be considered the Sabbath Day.   While he emphasized that he doesn’t want me to use the "man’s word", in his post he himself relies on man’s word (he calls it "actual and verifiable history").    I will point out to you both Biblical and historical evidence to that proves that Sunday is indeed the true Sabbath Day.  In fairness I will only use a small sample of biblical and historical texts from long before the time of Constantine, on whom Christopher seems content to hang the "blame" for changing the Sabbath.

    First, a very important piece of scriptural evidence.   There are many passages in the Old Testament that prophesy the end of the exclusive covenant between God and the  children of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, to be replaced with a new and everlasting covenant between God and the whole world, Jews and Gentiles alike.  Many of them describe the new worship in prophetic terms.  In one particular passage it is specifically stated that the old sabbaths would be brought to an end.

    "And I will cause all her mirth to cease, her solemnities, her new moons, her sabbaths, and all her festival times. " (Hosea 2:11, Douay Rheims Bible, referred to hereafter as DRB).

    For a New Testament passage that fulfills this prophecy, we have Colossians 2:16-17 -

    [16] Let no man therefore judge you in meat or in drink, or in respect of a festival day, or of the new moon, or of the sabbaths, [17] Which are a shadow of things to come, but the body is of Christ.  [DRB]

    Here is the same passage in a popular Protestant version:

    Colossians 2:16 
    16 Therefore do not let anyone judge you by what you eat or drink, or with regard to a religious festival, a New Moon celebration or a Sabbath day. 17 Which are a shadow of things to come; but the body is of Christ.
    [New International Version (NIV)] 

    Here is a passage from Acts that shows the day they came together to "do this (the Eucharistic sacrifice) in memory of me" as he commanded [Luke 22:19; 1st Corinthians 11:24]:

    Acts 20:7
    [7] And on the first day of the week, when we were assembled to break bread, Paul discoursed with them, being to depart on the morrow: and he continued his speech until midnight.
    [DRB ]

    7 On the first day of the week we came together to break bread. Paul spoke to the people and, because he intended to leave the next day, kept on talking until midnight.

    The first say of the week was known also as the eighth day, the 1st day of the New Creation.  It was also commonly known as "The Lord's Day", and in the Book of Revelation we see it referred to as that:

    "On the Lord’s Day I was in the Spirit, and I heard behind me a loud voice like a trumpet,"
    (Revelation 1:10 NIV)

    In the Old Testament the Old Covenant was instituted when God gave a covenant through Moses to the Jews.  The Old Covenant was abolished at the cross.   Below are some more Biblical passages that talk about the superiority of the New Covenant and our freedom under it from the requirements of the Old Covenant.

    Hebrews 8:6-7
    6 But in fact the ministry Jesus has received is as superior to theirs as the covenant of which he is mediator is superior to the old one, since the new covenant is established on better promises.

     7 For if there had been nothing wrong with that first covenant, no place would have been sought for another.

    Freedom in Christ - Galations 5:1-6

     1 It is for freedom that Christ has set us free. Stand firm, then, and do not let yourselves be burdened again by a yoke of slavery.
     2 Mark my words! I, Paul, tell you that if you let yourselves be circumcised, Christ will be of no value to you at all. 3 Again I declare to every man who lets himself be circumcised that he is obligated to obey the whole law. 4 You who are trying to be justified by the law have been alienated from Christ; you have fallen away from grace. 5 For through the Spirit we eagerly await by faith the righteousness for which we hope. 6 For in Christ Jesus neither circumcision nor uncircumcision has any value. The only thing that counts is faith expressing itself through love.

    Here are quotations of Early Christians, showing that the tradition of Sunday worship goes back to the time of the apostles and their immediate successors.

    90AD DIDACHE: "Christian Assembly on the Lord's Day: 1. But every Lord's day do ye gather yourselves together, and break bread, and give thanksgiving after having confessed your transgressions, that your sacrifice may be pure. 2. But let no one that is at variance with his fellow come together with you, until they be reconciled, that your sacrifice may not be profaned. 3. For this is that which was spoken by the Lord: In every place and time offer to me a pure sacrifice; for I am a great King, saith the Lord, and my name is wonderful among the nations." (Didache: The Teaching of the Twelve Apostles, Chapter XIV)

    100 AD BARNABAS "We keep the eighth day [Sunday] with joyfulness, the day also on which Jesus rose again from the dead" (The Epistle of Barnabas, 100 AD 15:6-8).

    100 AD BARNABAS: Moreover God says to the Jews, 'Your new moons and Sabbaths 1 cannot endure.' You see how he says, 'The present Sabbaths are not acceptable to me, but the Sabbath which I have made in which, when I have rested [heaven: Heb 4] from all things, I will make the beginning of the eighth day which is the beginning of another world.' Wherefore we Christians keep the eighth day for joy, on which also Jesus arose from the dead and when he appeared ascen+ded into heaven. (15:8f, The Epistle of Barnabas, 100 AD, Ante-Nicene Fathers , vol. 1, pg. 147) ,-

    150AD JUSTIN: "He then speaks of those Gentiles, namely us, who in every place offer sacrifices to Him, i.e., the bread of the Eucharist, and also the cup of the Eucharist, affirming both that we glorify His name, and that you profane [it]. The command of circumcision, again, bidding [them] always circumcise the children on the eighth day, was a type of the true circumcision, by which we are circumcised from deceit and iniquity through Him who rose from the dead on the first day after the Sabbath, [namely through] our Lord Jesus Christ. For the first day after the Sabbath, remaining the first of all the days, is called, however, the eighth, according to the number of all the days of the cycle, and [yet] remains the first.". (Justin, Dialogue 41:4)

    How we answer to the question of whether the true Sabbath is Saturday or Sunday depends on how we treat the tradition and authority of the Church Christ founded.  Some people believe that they can divorce the authority of scripture from the authority of the Church.  That is not only inconsistent (because the Church, by her divinely given authority, chose the canon of scripture, distinguishing divinely inspired books from those that lack divine inspiration), it is also unbiblical.  According to scripture, the pillar and foundation of truth is not scripture itself, but the Church:

    1 Timothy 3:15 if I am delayed, you will know how people ought to conduct themselves in God’s household, which is the church of the living God, the pillar and foundation of the truth. (NIV)

    When Christ came He did not form a publishing house.  He did not write a book, and he did not command that books should be written.  He founded a Church.  The writing of books of scripture was part of the larger general command to teach and make disciples of all nations, to pass on the traditions that He taught his disciples.  That passing on of sacred tradition has always been and always will be through two channels of transmission - word of mouth and epistle, i.e. oral and written tradition:

    2Thessalonians 2:15 So then, brothers, stand firm and hold to the teachings we passed on to you, whether by word of mouth or by letter. (NIV)

    2Thessalonians 2:15 Therefore, brethren, stand fast; and hold the traditions which you have learned, whether by word, or by our epistle.(DRB) 

    The authority of scripture is the divine authority God gave to the Church.  It is incoherent to reject the latter in the name of the former.  It is a misuse of the Bible to lump sacred apostolic tradition in with the merely human tradition rightly condemned in scripture (Mark 7:8 and Colossians 2:8).  The same Bible that commands us to reject human tradition that denies the word of God tells us that the word of God will be given to us through sacred tradition.  The distinction between sacred apostolic tradition which we are commanded to keep and human tradition which we are commanded to reject is a scriptural distinction and absolutely necessary.

    The central issue is in the opposite ways Christopher and I treat the teaching authority of the Church Christ founded.   He thinks he can disregard the authority of the Church while claiming to believe the Bible.  Scripture does not support his error.

    Matthew 16:18 And I say to thee: That thou art Peter; and upon this rock I will build my church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it. (DRB) 

    Jesus replied, “Blessed are you, Simon son of Jonah, for this was not revealed to you by flesh and blood, but by my Father in heaven. 18 And I tell you that you are Peter,[b] and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of Hades[c] will not overcome it. 19 I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven; whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven.” (Matthew 16:17-19 NIV)

    18 Then Jesus came to them and said, “All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me. 19 Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, 20 and teaching them to obey everything I have commanded you. And surely I am with you always, to the very end of the age.” (Matthew 28:18-20 NIV)

    And Jesus coming, spoke to them, saying: All power is given to me in heaven and in earth. [19] Going therefore, teach ye all nations; baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost. [20] Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and behold I am with you all days, even to the consummation of the world. (Matthew 28:18-20) DRB) 

    "He who listens to you listens to me; he who rejects you rejects me; but he who rejects me rejects him who sent me." Luke 10:16 (NIV) Source URL:
    Visit Out law republican for Daily Updated Hairstyles Collection

Hollywood's Cutest Kids 2011

    Hollywood's Cutest Kids 2011

    It can be seen that Hollywood's cutest kids are not only genetically blessed by their famous parents but also own label-heavy wardrobes. Let's see the most-wanted celebrity kids before they grow up.

    Suri Cruise, daughter of Tom and Katie, is the favorite adorable target for paparazzi since she was born.

    The Beckham Boys

    The Beckham boys - Brooklyn, 10, Romeo, 6, and Cruz, 4 are just perfect.

    The twins made a rare public appearance

    Vivien and Knox
    It is rare to see the entire Brangelina family. Recently, Angelina and Brad are seen leisurely walking in the street of New Orleans, Louisiana along with six children Maddox, Pax, Zahara, Shiloh, Knox, and Vivienne over the weekend. The famous Jolie-Pitt twins, Vivienne Marcheline and Knox Leon seem to have the most perfect genes from their hot parents. They are absolutely adorable and gorgeous.

    Leni - Heidi Klum

    Like mother like daughter, Leni looks totally adorable and cute.

    Little heartbreaker Levi Alves McConaughey is definitely “Cutest Baby Alive”

    Shiloh Jolie-Pitt
    No cutest Hollywood kid list is completed without Shiloh - daughter of the golden couple. At the age of five, Shiloh is interested in dressing like a little tomboy kid.

    Sheraphina Affleck
    2-year-old Sheraphina Affleck, daughter of Jennifer Garner and Ben Affleck

    Levi McConaughey
    While Daddy Matthew McConaughey is named the “Sexiest Man Alive”…

    Thomas - Jack Black
    The son of American comedian and actor Jack Black looks like an angle.

    Ruby - Tobey Maguire
    "Spiderman" star Tobey Maguire has an adorable daughter Ruby Sweetheart.

    Violet Affleck

    The oldest daughter of Jennifer Garner and Ben Affleck is the happiest child in Hollywood. Voilet is always seen with a smile on her face.

    Source URL:
    Visit Out law republican for Daily Updated Hairstyles Collection

Celebrity Rumor Mill

    Celebrity Rumor Mill

    Rihanna, Chris Brown
    MediaTakeOut reports that “Chris Brown’s camp is speaking with Rihanna’s people and trying to see if the two artists can have a joint tour.” According to the site, “Tickets for [Rihanna's] tour aren’t selling as well as they hoped, and adding Chris to the lineup would definitely help.” The site adds, “Rihanna would definitely do it.” For how the two singers feel about performing together and when their tour would begin. (Link)

    Kate Hudson, Couples
    “Kate Hudson: Pregnant & Betrayed,” reads the headline of an In Touch story that reports Hudson’s baby daddy, Matt Bellamy, is cheating on her. According to the mag, Bellamy was caught “holding hands and kissing” a “sweet college girl” at a party thrown by Bellamy and his Muse bandmates. In Touch goes on to paint Bellamy as a philandering party animal. (Link)

    Jennifer Aniston, Brad Pitt
    According to In Touch, Jennifer Aniston recently went on the “worst date ever.” The mag reports her blind date “didn’t even wait for Jen to show up before ordering,” and when she did sit down, he “kept on asking questions about Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie.” Wait, it gets worse. When the bill came, the guy wanted to split the check. (Link)

    Demi Lovato, Selena Gomez
    HollywoodLife reports there’s a “feud brewing between Demi Lovato, Selena Gomez & Rebecca Black.” According to the site, newcomer Black “cast the first stone by gushing about Selena’s guy Justin Bieber in interviews.” And the reason for Black’s troubles with Lovato is that she may “replace Demi as the next Disney Channel ‘it girl,’” says the site, which warns she shouldn’t “try to ignite something with Demi’s ex, Joe Jonas. (Link)

    Kourtney Kardashian, Scott Disick
    In Touch reports that Scott Disick and Kourtney Kardashian are embroiled in a “battle for the baby.” According to the magazine, the fighting has become so fierce between them over son Mason, Disick recently “put an end to their wedding plans,” and said he’s going to consult a custody lawyer “in case things don’t work out between them.” (Link)

    Justin Bieber, Musicians
    The National Enquirer reports that when Justin Bieber recently left a Los Angeles recording studio, a teenage female fan asked for a hug. As Bieber obliged, notes the mag, he suddenly “felt a slight tug on the back of his head.” According to the Enquirer, the young girl then “triumphantly held up a tiny lock of Bieber hair she’d snipped with fingernail scissors and squealed: ‘I got it!’” before dashing off. (Link)

    Jessica Biel, Gerard Butler
    Perez Hilton reports that “only days after her split with JT [Justin Timberake], Jessica Biel has been focused on flirting with hunky Gerard Butler all over Louisiana,” where the two are filming a movie. He adds that the attractive stars “have also been spending an awful lot of time off the set,” going to dinners, and drinking “margaritas left and right!” (Link)

    Lady Gaga, Musicians

    According to the Mirror, Lady Gaga is spending about $2 million to redecorate her New York apartment, and wants to “install her giant Grammys stage egg as a bed.” The British tab reports that Gaga will “be able to sleep in it, in place of a double bed,” and explains, “when she’s in it she feels at peace.” (Link)

    Britney Spears, Musicians
    According to Perez Hilton, Britney Spears has “hired a money management tutor from the Anderson School of Management at UCLA to help her understand the basics of finance so she can manage her own affairs.” Perez explains that Spears “wants to win control of her finances. The tutor will help with basic skills – like balancing personal accounts and time management.” (Link)

    Reality, Breakups
    “It’s Over!” exclaims OK! in a cover story about “The Bachelor” Brad Womack and his fiancée, Emily Maynard. According to the mag, “They’re still smiling for the cameras, but Emily has now dumped Brad for good” after watching him fool around with other women on the show. Adds the weekly, “Although Emily is doing her best to abide by ‘The Bachelor’ agreements… she’s having a hard time being around him.” (Link)

     Jessica Simpson, Eric Johnson
    Star reveals exclusive “details of the iron-clad prenup” between Jessica Simpson and Eric Johnson. According to the mag, Johnson will get half a million dollars “as a wedding present. Then, on each anniversary, he’ll get another $200,000. If he and Jessica make it to five years of marriage, he’ll get an additional $500,000 bonus – and a $1 million bonus if they make it to 10 years.” And there’s more. (Link)Source URL:
    Visit Out law republican for Daily Updated Hairstyles Collection

Did Stephen Lerner Advocate Economic Terrorism?

Most revealing red carpet fashions ever

    Most revealing red carpet fashions ever

     Rihanna’s dress at the Grammys got us thinking… Who can forget Jennifer Lopez’s famous jungle dress at the Grammys, or Lil’ Kim’s pasties at the VMAs? When celebrities want attention, they know how to get it. From almost naked to way too sheer, these 10 celebrities’ red carpet outfits left little – or absolutely nothing – to the imagination.

    As Rihanna walked the red carpet at the 2011 Grammys, people actually asked her “Who are you wearing?” How was that their first question? Ours was, “what, exactly, do you have on underneath the tissue paper stripes you have swathed around your naked form?” In case you wanted the answer to the first question, it’s Jean Paul Gaultier. The answer to the latter question remains a mystery.

    Jennifer Lopez

     Ah, the infamous Versace jungle print ‘dress’ that introduced the population to a whole new interpretation of what qualifies as an appropriate award show outfit. When Jennifer Lopez arrived at the 2000 Grammy awards, she was basically wearing a sarong that had been fashioned into a dress over teal bikini boy shorts. She was actually nominated for an award that night, but does anyone even remember whether she won or lost?

    Toni Braxton

    It was so innovative of Jennifer Lopez to start the whole, “there’s really no need to wear a ‘dress’ when you can just put on some scraps of fabric” trend. As you can see, it caught on quickly among famous exhibitionists like Grammy nominee and winner Toni Braxton. The singer wore this uh, white apron-cape with a sequin belt (for what? modesty?) at the 2001 awards. We really hope it wasn’t windy that night.

    Taylor Momsen

     It’s not just the Grammys that brings out celebrities’ inner provocateurs. Taylor Momsen has become quite well known for wearing underwear as outerwear on red carpets despite the fact that she is 17 and looks horribly inappropriate when she shows up at, say, the premiere of Justin Bieber’s movie dressed this way. If this picture has you asking “where are her parents!?” don’t worry, you’re not alone.

    Leighton Meester

    On the opposite end of the classy spectrum is Taylor Momsen’s Gossip Girl co-star, Leighton Meester. The stylish and usually fully covered star startled everyone when she showed up at the Harry Winston Court of Jewels Recreation in a completely sheer Marchesa romper with a plunging neckline. Our rule of thumb? If your outfit requires you to borrow your grandmother’s lace underwear (and it shows), do reconsider.

    Rose McGowan

     Honestly, Rose McGowan, there’s shock value, and then there’s just showing up naked. You did the latter at the VMAs in 1998. Très déclassé.

    Lil’ Kim

    If you’re having a sparkly lavender bodysuit custom-made for the ’99 VMAs, it’s only natural that you’d say to your seamstress, “could you sew it so my left breast is completely exposed and then make a matching pasty? I really think it would add a little something extra – I just don’t think my sparkly lavender bodysuit and matching purple wig have enough of a wow-factor.” At least, that’s the conversation we like to imagine took place…

    Katy Perry

    While Jennifer Lopez gets credit for single-handedly reviving the double-sided tape industry, Britney Spears helped launched another form of titillating bodywear in the music video for Toxic: the bedazzled nude bodysuit. Katy Perry wore the dress form of this trend to the 2010 MTV movie awards, but she adapted Spears’ bodysuit, on which the rhinestones were randomly scattered, to make her outfit a little more MTV-audience-friendly.

    Christina Aguilera

    This is how Christina Aguilera looked in 2000. We’ll just pause and let that sink in. Remember our rule of thumb for Leighton Meester? We have one for Christina, too. Laces are for shoes, not clothes. We’re not even going to address that hairstyle.

    Coco Austin

    Source URL:
    Visit Out law republican for Daily Updated Hairstyles Collection

Blog Archive